Comparing carbon policies made easy
Major debate now envelops Federal Parliament on climate change and how Australia will respond to the threat. This is a complex debate with numerous implications for the Australian environment, businesses and individuals. It could also be the ‘trigger’ for new federal elections in 2010.
A Charles Sturt University (CSU) expert on climate change policy, Professor Kevin Parton, has developed a simple comparison between the two policies, both of which aim to reduce greenhouse gases by encouraging new non-polluting technology or sequestrating, or ‘storing’, carbon dioxide.
| Issue |
Federal Government
|
Federal Opposition |
| Policy mechanism | Increase the price of carbon by charging polluters | Subsidy to those producers who volunteer to introduce non-polluting or carbon-sequestering technology
|
| What is the encouragement for sustainable new technology? | Disadvantages old carbon polluting technology and hence encourages all new sustainable technology | Guesses what sustainable technology will work and encourages just a few technologies, such as soil carbon storage and tree planting.
|
| Carbon price | Sets the carbon price and allows market to determine the best type of future technology | Avoids setting carbon price and tries to induce adoption of new technology directly
|
| Paid for by | Polluters (but eventually price increases for consumers. Also features compensation for less-well-off) | Taxpayers |
| Impact on greenhouse gases (effectiveness)
|
Slight at outset, but much scope to reduce greenhouse gases by decreasing the amount of carbon that can be emitted. | Impact slight. Possible large cost to government if the scheme is extended
|
| Complexity | Complex, but most individuals do not need to know about the detail | Simple
|
| Explanation given to date | Poor (eg, few people realise that fewer than 1000 firms are involved and that they collectively produce 75% of greenhouse gases) | Good
|
| Economic efficiency | In theory the most efficient policy (but it becomes less efficient the more exemptions - eg, free permits - that are allowed) | Less efficient
|
| Impact on social equity | If compensation is paid to consumers, equity effect is close to neutral | Neutral
|
A concrete use for carpet fibres
Australian engineers have come up with an unexpected use for discarded carpets: as a means to...
COP29: finance, a "crucial" opportunity and a seat at the table
Leaders and diplomats from around the world are descending on Baku, Azerbaijan, this month for...
Spacious, sturdy and relocatable: steel site office ticks all the boxes
When looking for a new office design, green steel company InfraBuild enlisted Modulate — a...
